Archive for July, 2009

Rupert Murdoch is Not Your Friend

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

A couple little victories in Washington last week…

On July 21, the Senate voted 58-40 to amend the $680 billion ($680,000,000,000) military bill to remove $1.75 billion ($1,750,000,000) for seven more F-22 fighter jets (the Pentagon already has 187 of these Cold War relics, isn’t using them, and didn’t want any more — Congress initially ignored this advice and insisted on paying for and making more).

Credit for this glimmer of sanity goes to Defense Secretary Gates, who urged the repeal, and Obama, who threatened veto (goes to show what good leadership can do). Jeers go to local senators Boxer and Feinstein, who porkishly voted against the cut (in fact, the amendment would not have passed without the support of 15 Republican senators).

This is, hopefully, a first baby step away from the unbridled military spending that we’ve undertaken in this country for far too long. We’ve got more weaponry than is good for us, or any other living thing on this planet. It’s time to tack left.

On July 17, the House Education and Labor Committee voted 27-19 to approve a Kucinich amendment allowing states to create their own single-payer healthcare plans (again, without 13 Republican ayes, this amendment would have perished).

If our federal government isn’t going to muster the integrity and courage to do what is sensible and right on healthcare this time around, this amendment will make it easier for states to lead the way to single-payer in this country.

The California legislature has twice passed a single-payer bill (SB 840) the past few years, only to watch the Governeggar veto it down both times (goes to show what bad leadership can do). Meanwhile, other states — Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Washington among them — have active single-payer efforts before their legislatures.

Single-payer began in Canada at the provincial level. Saskatchewan is where it started. Other provinces saw how successful it was and joined in. By 1971, Canada decided to make it federal. Contrary to all the blatant disinformation streaming from FOX News, Canadians (and all the other single-payer nation citizens) like their National Healthcare. Why shouldn’t they? They pay less for superior results (Americans pay the most, by far, yet rank near the bottom).

Remember, folks, Rupert Murdoch is not your friend, he’s just another tax-dodging zillionaire, taking advantage of what America has become (a shooting range for avaricious free-marketeers). Don’t believe everything he and his minions tell you. Read, investigate, circulate, and draw your own conclusions. Until a majority of Americans learn to think for themselves, we will remain, collectively, fish in a barrel.

This brings to mind the letter in last week’s AVA urging Ukiahans to relax and let the “big boys” (in this case, the developers DDR) do whatever they want, so that we might save pennies on our next widget purchase. That is exactly the sort of narrow, short-term, non-thinking that leads straight to the long-term disaster we’re presently caught in (and it is exactly what Rupert and friends want you to think, which is why they purchased most of the media in this country). We’ve got to think a little deeper than that, people, we need to be more aware of the bigger picture. There is a lot of cause-and-effect going on out there. It’s called connecting the dots. Those “pennies off” come at a huge social cost, and many of us don’t want to pay that price.

Survey the landscape before you nibble the cheese.

Blue Dogs and Unicorns

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

I had dinner with our representative, Mike Thompson, last night (July 11). An intimate affair with a hundred others.

The good news is that Single Payer advocates showed up in force. There were activists outside with flyers and placards, and many more paid their way inside. I think Mike knew we were coming, as he closed his speech with a big healthcare-reform finish. Then he opened up the Q and A session. The subject of Single Payer dominated that last half hour, and everyone that spoke was for it.

Mike’s rhetorical tautology against Single Payer is that we just can’t have it. (What that really means is that he is unwilling to take on one of his primary donors, the medical industrial complex.) He’s just another off-the-table democrat. One of Mike’s favorite excuses is the mythical American unicorn who “likes his healthcare plan” and is “terrified of change.” Mike is terribly concerned about this person, and doesn’t want to scare him.

Look, we can always find some kook out there who believes anything, but should we base our public policy decisions on the fears of the most uninformed and ignorant among us? Non-kooks would say no. The real reason Mike keeps trotting out this aberration is it is about all the industry has left to fight with. Imaginary fear. This unicorn is the 2009 version of Harry and Louise.

The bad news is that Mike Thompson was pretty much as expected, a career politician who has become comfortable in his position. Let’s just say this blue dog spends a lot of time curled up by the fire, at the feet of Master. 

The most disappointing aspect of the evening, for me, was the high level of prevarication that is tolerated in such a forum. The whopper of the evening was when Mike told us that money has absolutely no effect on legislators. Imagine that! “Attention, lobbyists and PACs, your money has no effect on Mike Thompson and friends. Attention, Health Insurance Industry, your $1.4 million spent every day is being wasted. Go home. Your money is no good here.” 

Folks, I’m here to report that Mike Thompson isn’t about to represent us in congress. He has other priorities. Twelve years of this is enough. We need to find another representative come 2010. Preferably, a progressive independent. Anyone out there?

P.S. It’s a shame Christina Aanestad wasn’t available to cover the event. It was a real public disservice to dismiss such a competent local reporter. Here’s an example: Christina’s report of Mike’s previous appearance at a local business luncheon (last month) caught some of his reactions to the Single Payer protest outside the venue. One of his statements was (paraphrase), “Look, there’s only twenty people out there, and the numbers go way down from there.” At Mike’s dinner, last night, he told the crowd he never said that. It would be harder to refute that if Christina hadn’t recorded it.